By Mike Tomlinson
Recently I was having a conversation with a friend of mine about the implications augmented reality (AR) will have on our everyday lives. We were discussing my blog post on how soon we will have digital eyeglasses that display information and images on top of our normal reality’s vision, just one of many other exciting ways AR will shape our future.
“Eyeglasses?” he said. “Try Contacts.”
He was right. And at that moment I realized what kind of invasiveness we all are in for.
It’s easy for us to be amused by the realm of possibilities augmented reality has to offer. But it’s a snowball effect—what we find neat and unique now will evolve into a form of technology we can no longer live without. Digital eyeglasses will become digital contacts, which will ultimately lead to digital implants. Are we on a path toward becoming cyborgs?
No, the Terminator is not just a couple years around the corner. AR will develop in incremental steps such as
digital property rights. Matthew Szymczyk prophetically wrote back in 2010 how augmented reality will force governments to reform property rights laws in a way that gives, for example, a digital AR representation of your house the same legal status that you enjoy with your “physical” house. Just like your current house is legally protected from graffiti artists drawing on your vinyl siding, the digital representation of your house that people see through their AR spectacles will also be protected. The great example Szymczyk provides is AR applied to restaurants and stores, where the legality of AR will have the most impact; after all, what’s to stop Trader Joe’s from plastering the digital storefront of Safeway with advertisements and coupons for their products in this alternate reality?
Even more disturbing will be the evolving choices AR allows us to make as it becomes more advanced. As you walk down the street looking through your cool new AR-modified glasses, you can filter out the undesirable elements of your real reality. Blighted storefronts and neighborhoods can be plastered over with images of beautiful (but fake) houses, trees, even people. Whatever it is we find unpleasant with what we see, we can change instantly and subjectively to our own liking. We just have to figure out next is if this is the reality we really want. Blogger David Murphy summed it up pretty well:
“This problem is more immediate and insidious— when you can choose your data sources, confirmation bias will come into play. When your ‘view’ on the world is carefully curated to match your personal preconceptions, the real world is no longer a common normalizing reality.”
I think I’ll just keep my glasses— and reality— analog for now.

